Investments on the Internet

Investments on the Internet: what is the public relations and how with it to struggle?

This article it would be desirable to devote to such phenomenon as forums on which investments on the Internet are discussed. Very often through forums Internet users try to manipulate. For this purpose there are special technologies and PR receptions which often appear rather effective. As object of a manipulation to be not so pleasant, it would be desirable to tell about how it to avoid.

Let's begin with that themselves PR actions, and what represent sense to them. Such activity as investments on the Internet keeps on one: trust of users to the investment project. On gaining this trust and PR technologies work. The public relations happen white and black. The first is directed on creation of good reputation, and the second – forms negative image. To create positive reputation to the project, the large quantity of positive responses and comments at various forums takes place. Under this business even the special sites which are engaged in advertising and advancement of the given goods or service are created. It is good, if all positive responses represent the facts, as often happens and on the contrary.

There is a question: and how to distinguish public relations and the present responses about projects? Here the logic is connected. Put itself on a place of this person which without benefit for itself will spend personally daily the time on infinite rashvalivanie the project, and at different forums? Would become you so to do? Most likely, no. It is possible to express one-two time thought that the given project is worthy attention, but no more that. Other question if someone suggests to put up money on the Internet on the referalnoj to the link. Such activity as referalnye payments makes solid profit for skilled investors. Thus the means do not need to be risked. It is possible to draw a conclusion that if someone persistently advertises any project, without having at first sight any reason for this purpose, that is does not offer own referalnuju the link, most likely, it is simply old kind public relations.

More often public relations of the action pass in the form of a writing of posts under different nikami. One person, being registered at a forum under different names, in every possible way praises highly the project. To check up, how many authors at such posts – one or the several, it is necessary to address privately to the moderator, let will check up an IP address of each of them. Thus it is necessary to check both identity of the address, and a proxy. Look also at dates of registration of those participants of forums, whose thoughts strongly coincide. Usually registration date one, or dates are nearby. If you "have got to the core" of swindle with public relations, on it it is possible to earn. But for this purpose it is not necessary to disclose the received information.

One of versions of white public relations is the organisation of different sites which advertise one goods or service. The owner at all these sites can be one. If owners different, they, most likely, have common causes.

If to sum up all told about white public relations in it there is nothing reprehensible if the information is thus given truthful.

Unlike white, the sneer company is directed on creation of bad reputation. Usually competing projects are engaged in it. Rates of people which are engaged in this kind of public relations, make 10-50 c.u. a day. All depends on the PR action how much is on a substantial scale developed. To distinguish a sneer company from the present negative responses it is possible by the same principle, as white. If someone constantly says that the given project unreliable, roguish it is necessary to prick up the ears: whether on the business it so? There is also other question: what for to these people to spend the time for warning against losses of other users? As it is known, altruism now not in a fashion. Most likely, these people pursue the aim – to earn more on a sneer company.

Black PR managers are given out often by conclusions under which there is no actual basis. If is easier: someone says that the given project – "kaka", however why it "kaka", the person cannot explain. More often about investment projects tell that their owners ostensibly owned earlier other fund which was closed, without having returned money to investors. Proofs thus, naturally, anybody cannot give.

Often black PR managers write a post at a forum, containing something negative about the project. Then the link to this forum appears as acknowledgement of the same information.

Anyway, action well organised and carefully planned public relations, all the same, black it or white, positively testifies to the investment project. If the information goes entirely "white", it means that managers are adjusted to untwist seriously the fund to involve more investors and fruitfully to work with them. In one-day projects, as a rule, strongly are not put.

If the sneer company prevails, it too about something speaks. And says it that competitors have become agitated and have begun to fuss, so, the project really standing, time considers its other funds as serious threat. Thus it is important to watch that the project administration reacted, denying compromising information by means of weighty proofs. If the management is silent, it can say that the fund is not going to work too long, and therefore the compromising evidence to it is not terrible.

We wish, that these councils have made your investments on the Internet safe and as much as possible favourable.